AI is Changing Software, Not Replacing Enterprise
If you read the headlines right now, you’d think enterprise software is on borrowed time.
Every week, there’s another post declaring some version of “SaaS is dead” or “AI just killed software as we know it.” LLMs are getting better at an incredible pace. AI startups are moving fast. Markets are nervous.
And the prevailing story goes something like this: traditional SaaS is broken, AI will replace it, and incumbents are about to be wiped out.
I don’t buy that story.
You can see why the anxiety exists.
Recently, Anthropic showed how Claude can generate lightweight workforce applications on the fly using Claude Artifacts, turning natural language into working tools almost instantly. It’s impressive, and it fuels the idea that if AI can just create apps for us, maybe we don’t need traditional enterprise software at all.
But that conclusion skips over something fundamental.
Large language models are only as good as the data they have access to. Their value depends on depth, context, and trust, not just scale.
That is where enterprise holds real power. Enterprises own the data that matters most in the AI era, from healthcare and the patient chart, to financial records, supply chain operations, customer history, and workforce activity. This data is proprietary, regulated, and deeply contextual. It cannot be scraped, recreated, or replaced by AI companies alone.
Just as important, this data is domain-specific and tied to real expertise. It reflects how clinicians practice medicine, how finance teams manage risk, how operators run systems, and how work actually gets done. That combination of data, domain knowledge, and workforce context is exactly what LLMs need to be truly useful.
SaaS, as we know it today, is under some pressure. But enterprise software itself is not being wiped out.
It is being forced to evolve.
SaaS is under pressure, but not for the reason people think.
The traditional SaaS model was built for a predictable world. We designed applications, defined workflows, and asked customers to configure them. That worked when variation was manageable, and workflows could be anticipated upfront.
AI breaks that assumption.
Users now operate in dynamic, moment-to-moment contexts. The number of possible paths explodes. Configuration stops being flexibility and starts becoming friction. The model strains under its own complexity.
From a user perspective, this shows up as fragmented experiences, inconsistent behavior, and loss of muscle memory. From an internal perspective, it shows up as slow delivery, brittle systems, and endless coordination across teams to manage edge cases.
This isn’t a failure of execution. It’s a structural limitation of the SaaS model.
The market is scared. It will correct.
Right now, markets are reacting to speed and uncertainty.
When AI demos show systems generating apps or workflows instantly, it’s easy to assume incumbents are finished. But history suggests something else. When foundational technology shifts, the companies that own critical infrastructure and data don’t disappear. They adapt.
What’s breaking is not enterprise itself. What’s breaking is the way enterprise software has traditionally been packaged and delivered.
That distinction matters.
The real challenge is not survival. It’s evolution.
Enterprise companies don’t need to panic. They need to move deliberately and confidently.
The old SaaS model won’t carry us forward. We can’t just bolt AI onto static applications and call it transformation. We have to rethink the experience itself.
That means moving away from fixed screens and predefined workflows. It means building systems that collaborate with AI instead of treating it as an add-on. It means designing experiences that adapt to context while preserving trust, safety, and consistency.
This isn’t about replacing humans. And it isn’t about handing everything to AI.
It’s about knowing when to automate, when to assist, and when humans must stay firmly in control, all grounded in enterprise data and deep domain expertise.
This is an opportunity, not a threat.
If you own the data, you have leverage.
Enterprise software companies, especially in regulated domains like healthcare, finance, and supply chain, are uniquely positioned to define what responsible, high-value AI integration actually looks like. They already operate in environments where auditability, explainability, and safety are non-negotiable.
That’s not a disadvantage. That’s a moat.
But only if we act on it.
We have to invent something new. Not SaaS as we’ve known it, and not consumer AI repackaged for the enterprise. A model that truly integrates and collaborates with AI, while respecting the realities of enterprise data, workflows, and trust.
If we do that, we don’t lose our place in the ecosystem.
We re-secure it.
Staying steady in a noisy moment.
This is a moment that rewards confidence, not panic.
SaaS is in trouble. That part is true.
But enterprise software is not being wiped out. It is being challenged to evolve.
The companies that stay steady, respect the power of their data, and move quickly to rethink how experience and intelligence come together will define the next era.